.jpg)
Kevin O'Leary crypto buying is back on. The O'Leary Ventures chairman told an industry conference in New York that he is opening new positions for the next market cycle, and his criterion is bigger than any single token. "I'm back in the saddle buying new positions, putting my bets on for this next cycle," O'Leary said in comments to a crypto trade publication at the Avalanche Summit in New York. The question he is underwriting is which blockchain becomes infrastructure for a major industry, and he says the answer is still wide open.
That openness is the interesting part. O'Leary said he can ask chief executives directly which networks their companies are evaluating, and the responses do not converge. Companies in different sectors are looking at different chains, and in his words, none of them are saying the same thing. For an investor whose last cycle was defined by passive Bitcoin exposure through ETFs, this one is a picks-and-shovels bet on rails, not coins.
The watershed moment Kevin O'Leary crypto bets are chasing
O'Leary described the first major stock exchange to adopt a blockchain as a potential watershed moment for the industry. The logic is straightforward: once a venue settles on a network and its compliance stack, every issuer, market maker and institution that touches that venue has an incentive to build on compatible infrastructure. That is how standards get set, not by committees but by whichever exchange moves first and forces everyone else to match it.
The groundwork is already visible. The New York Stock Exchange has been building onchain settlement infrastructure for tokenized securities, with NYSE President Lynn Martin saying in August that work continues on a dedicated digital trading platform. NYSE parent Intercontinental Exchange has agreed to invest in tZERO and license its blockchain patents for a platform designed to support round-the-clock trading with immediate settlement. Nasdaq took a different route, putting $100 million into Kraken parent Payward at a $21 billion valuation, with Nasdaq Equity Tokens targeted for the second quarter of 2027. Regulators are moving in parallel: the SEC recently granted tokenized securities venues five years of conditional relief to trade eligible tokenized US stocks, as reported by Bitnxt.
For O'Leary, the exchange question doubles as a diligence tool. If one venue's choice of chain drags hundreds of listed companies toward the same infrastructure, the network that wins that contract inherits an institutional user base overnight. That is the adoption wave he is positioning for, and it explains why he is asking executives about networks rather than tokens.
Regulation stays on the agenda, midterms or not
On Washington, O'Leary was blunt about the timeline. He does not expect the CLARITY Act to pass before the midterm elections, after the Senate's failed procedural vote, though seven Democrats have since reopened negotiations on the bill. But he argued that tax policy is the hook that keeps Congress at the table. "If you're going to provide a tax policy on this asset, you want more regulation, not less," he said. The House Ways and Means Committee advanced the Digital Asset Tax Certainty Act in a 38 to 5 vote on Sept. 16, a package covered by Bitnxt that includes an exception for qualifying transaction fees up to $10 alongside rules for wash sales, stablecoins, lending, mining, staking and broker reporting.
His position has shifted over the year. In January, he hoped market structure legislation could clear before the midterms. By June, he was framing a bill as a catalyst for pension funds and sovereign wealth funds. The current read, post-cloture-failure, is more patient: regulation is coming because taxation is coming, and institutions cannot allocate at scale to an asset whose rules rewrite every quarter.
One to three percent, and why the ceiling exists
On sizing, O'Leary anchored Bitcoin to gold. Institutional alternative allocations already carry gold as a store-of-value sleeve, and he sees Bitcoin eventually taking 1% to 3% of that allocation. The top of his range matches comments from earlier this year, when he said some institutions are reluctant to push past roughly 3% exposure because of quantum computing risk to the network's long-term security. That debate is live at the protocol level, with developers weighing migration proposals to reduce future quantum exposure, a conversation Ledger's CTO framed for Bitnxt as a migration problem measured in years.
The rest of his book is deliberately unglamorous. O'Leary said he is investing in the power infrastructure that AI models require rather than the models themselves, citing projects in Norway, Finland, Alberta and Utah, plus uranium exposure as data center electricity demand climbs. His AI thesis and his crypto thesis rhyme: own the boring layer the hype depends on.
For readers, the actionable signal is the exchange watch, not the purchases. When the first major venue commits to a chain, the compliance and infrastructure stocks around that decision move faster than the tokens. O'Leary is early precisely because he does not know which network wins, and he is paying for the option rather than the answer. The question to watch next: whether NYSE's tokenized platform or Nasdaq's equity tokens reach regulators' desks first, because the first approval sets the template everyone else will copy.
