Coins.ph gambling payments allegations have brought renewed attention to the Philippine crypto platform’s compliance arrangements. CoinDesk reported that the business faces potential action from the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas, citing two people familiar with the situation and alleged transactions involving restricted offshore gambling operators.
The allegations should be distinguished from the service disruption users can verify directly. Coins.ph’s official status page lists InstaPay and PESONet cash-ins under maintenance, while their corresponding cash-out services are marked operational.
The reviewed material does not establish a final licence-revocation decision. Reporting a possible sanction as an accomplished shutdown would go beyond the evidence.
Coins.ph gambling payments: what is alleged?
The reported allegations concern business transactions involving offshore gambling firms. One source described the potential violations as serious enough to threaten the company’s operating licence. That remains an attributed assessment rather than a published regulatory determination.
The report also described restrictions affecting deposits through DCPay Philippines, the entity handling the platform’s electronic-money and peso-payment operations.
What remains unresolved is the precise enforcement outcome: the relevant findings, affected permissions, any penalty and the conditions for restoring restricted access.
No directly verified company response addressing the new gambling allegations was obtained in this research. Its service-status notices should not be represented as a substantive response to those allegations.
What users can verify on the official dashboard
The official service page provides a narrower—and more practical—picture than a blanket claim that the exchange has stopped operating.
Service | Status shown when reviewed |
InstaPay cash-in | Under maintenance |
PESONet cash-in | Under maintenance |
InstaPay cash-out | Operational |
PESONet cash-out | Operational |
Spot exchange | Operational |
Mobile app and website | Operational |
The InstaPay cash-in incident is dated September 29, 2026, at 1:00 p.m. Philippine time and remains labelled “Investigating.”
These are platform-reported service conditions. They do not guarantee that every individual transaction will succeed or explain the complete regulatory basis for a disruption.
Users should check the specific funding or withdrawal channel they intend to use, rather than infer availability from the app opening normally.
Why DCPay and Betur should not be conflated
Coins.ph operates through more than one legal entity. Its help centre identifies Betur Inc. and DCPay Philippines Inc. as BSP-regulated entities. Reporting on the earlier payment restriction distinguishes DCPay’s electronic-money operations from Betur’s crypto services.
Consequently, a restriction on an inbound payment channel is not automatically proof that a separate virtual-asset permission has been revoked.
This distinction does not resolve the new allegations. It identifies which additional documents would be needed to establish their operational consequences.
For background on assessing service providers, Bitnxt’s crypto trading brokers directory can support discovery. Current regulatory status should be verified against the relevant authority’s records.
The confirmed gambling-access policy background
BSP Memorandum M-2025-029 instructed supervised institutions to remove links providing in-app gambling access from their mobile payment apps and websites within 48 hours. The memorandum refers to a Monetary Board resolution dated August 14, 2025.
Its wording matters: the document addresses in-app access, including services redirecting account holders to gambling sites. It should not be presented as an adjudication of Coins.ph’s alleged conduct or as a complete prohibition on every gambling-related payment.
Any enforcement assessment would require the applicable rules, transaction evidence and regulator’s findings.
What the situation means for customers
Bitnxt’s practical assessment: Preserve transaction confirmations, receipts and relevant support correspondence if a payment is delayed or rejected. Separate an incoming-transfer problem from an account restriction or withdrawal problem when contacting support.
Bitnxt’s crypto tax software directory offers tools for organizing financial history, although original records should be retained separately.
Readers reviewing custody choices can also consult the Bitnxt wallet comparison. Moving assets involves its own network, address and custody considerations; regulatory headlines alone do not determine the appropriate choice for an individual user.
Bitnxt view: identify the affected service before judging the platform
Bitnxt’s editorial assessment: The clearest verified development is disruption to particular inbound payment channels. The gambling allegations and potential wider sanctions require separate confirmation.
The next meaningful disclosures would identify the regulator’s findings, affected entity and permissions, remediation requirements and restoration timetable. Until then, the report should remain precise about what is alleged, what the platform shows and what has not been established.
You might also like: Best Crypto Payment Gateway: How to Choose the Right Crypto Payment Processor.
